Do share
Workflow type, rough volume, tools involved, owner time, delays, rework, and what a person must approve.
V1 start path · AI workflow intake agent
Answer a few practical questions about one repeated service-business workflow. If the guided AI assessment is available, the fields you provide are used to prepare a readiness result; otherwise the page uses a browser-local rubric. Either way, generating a result is not a purchase, call booking, audit kickoff, or automatic human submission.
The intake does not collect payment, show public checkout, book calls, create a customer record, or ask for secrets. Use redacted notes only. Human review is optional and should be used only when the page confirms delivery is available or when Payback Map has shared the intake path with you directly.
What you get in minutes
Before you answer
When the guided AI assessment is available, only the fields on this page are used to prepare the readiness result; if not, the same fields are scored locally in your browser. Keep examples redacted, do not paste production secrets or private customer details, and do not treat the readiness result as a submitted customer record.
Workflow type, rough volume, tools involved, owner time, delays, rework, and what a person must approve.
Passwords, API keys, billing data, private customer lists, regulated details, addresses, phone numbers, or sensitive notes.
The result tells you whether to gather more examples, ask for a scoping conversation, or prepare for a paid Payback Map audit.
First-buyer evidence checklist
A first Payback Map audit works best when one workflow has enough real-world evidence to inspect. Keep everything redacted: this page is not an upload portal, does not store these materials, and does not start paid work by itself.
Name the repeated handoff to map first: missed-call recovery, estimate follow-up, scheduling, intake routing, reporting, support, invoicing, or another weekly bottleneck.
Bring weekly or monthly counts, time spent, delay, rework, missed follow-up, owner interruptions, or lost-opportunity signals. Ranges are fine.
List the inboxes, phones, forms, CRM, calendar, spreadsheet, scheduler, invoice tool, project system, and people involved today.
Prepare two to five screenshots, emails, call notes, templates, tickets, or status lists with names, contact details, addresses, payment data, and sensitive facts removed.
Name who must review customer-visible messages, price changes, refunds, complaints, schedule promises, opt-outs, exceptions, or anything risky.
Decide whether the report should help an owner, operations lead, VA, consultant, or builder choose a first pilot after the audit.
Before you request review
The intake is meant to scope one workflow, not pressure you into a call. Use these public pages to confirm what the $299 audit includes, how the sample report is structured, and what materials make the 72-hour work useful.
The fictional sample shows the expected level of detail: ranked opportunities, payback assumptions, human-review rules, first pilot ticket, and not-to-automate boundaries.
The 72-hour clock starts only after scope is confirmed, safe evidence has been received, and payment or approval to proceed is complete. Review what happens at each stage before requesting paid work.
The report guide explains why each section exists and which buyer decision it should support before any implementation or automation spend.
The checklist lists useful rough notes: workflow volume, current tools, redacted examples, delays, rework, and human approval points.
Start the intake
Keep it rough. The goal is to decide whether there is enough signal for a useful Payback Map, not to produce a perfect process document.
After the intake
The readiness result should make it clear which step you are on. No step below books a call, opens checkout, starts paid work, stores private customer data, or sends customer messages from this page.
Run the intake with rough, redacted notes to see whether one workflow is worth inspecting. If the result is weak, keep reading the sample and checklist before sharing more.
Look for a repeated workflow, visible delay or rework, enough volume, current tools, and a clear rule for what a person must approve before customers see anything.
If the workflow looks promising, gather safe starting materials: redacted examples, rough counts, owners, tools, pain points, and the approval boundary. Ask for a scoping review only when delivery is confirmed.
The $299 audit is paid only after the workflow, scope, and safe materials are clear. This public intake page does not expose a live checkout or create an automatic purchase.
The audit clock starts only after scope confirmation, safe evidence receipt, and payment or approval to proceed are complete—not when you generate the intake result, save a summary, or request optional review.