Price
$299 intro audit
One scoped workflow, one buyer-ready report, one first pilot plan.
Feature table
Payback Map is a 72-hour AI workflow audit for one repeated service-business workflow. It turns your workflow notes into a ranked report, AI readiness score, first pilot ticket, and safe next-step plan—without asking for passwords or changing live systems.
The static page does not collect payment, book a call, or submit private customer data. The audit starts after workflow, scope, payment, and safe starting materials are confirmed.
Price
One scoped workflow, one buyer-ready report, one first pilot plan.
Timeline
Intake, analysis, report build, quality review, and handoff notes.
Scope
Lead response, estimates, scheduling, intake, reporting, support, invoicing, or another repeated handoff.
Review before buying
Use these pages to check the report format, examples, prep effort, and scope boundaries. If the page was shared with you directly, bring questions back into that thread.
| Buyer question | Where to review it | What it should answer | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|
| What does the finished report look like? | Sample Payback Map report | Format, ranked opportunities, prompts, SOPs, oversight map, and first pilot ticket. | Check whether the output is specific enough for your team or builder to act on. |
| Is my workflow a good candidate? | AI intake agent and readiness checklist | Repeated workflow, rough volume, safe examples, current tools, and human approval points. | Generate an AI-assisted readiness result from the fields you enter; no payment, calendar booking, or human review request happens unless the intake page asks for email and consent. |
| What kind of service-business workflows fit? | Missed-call, painting CRM, flooring, and landscape previews | How one messy handoff becomes a practical AI-assisted workflow plan. | Compare your workflow to the closest preview and note what is similar or different. |
| What is included for $299? | This service details page and the one-page buyer sheet | Feature-by-feature deliverables, exclusions, guarantee boundary, and 72-hour process. | Use the table below to decide whether the audit is the right first step. |
| What if I need a conversation first? | FAQ starting questions | Payment timing, materials to gather, buyer time required, and when the delivery clock starts. | If this page was sent to you directly, reply in that thread with the intake result and questions. |
Report sections
This is the table a buyer can use to understand exactly what the audit includes and how each section helps the next business decision.
| Feature | What you receive | Why it matters | Buyer preparation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow inventory | Current steps, owners, tools, queues, handoffs, delays, and customer-visible risk points. | Shows where work actually slows down before software or automation is chosen. | Bring one repeated workflow and rough weekly volume. |
| Friction and value map | Time leakage, missed follow-up risk, rework loops, and estimated payback ranges. | Makes the $299 decision tangible without promising guaranteed ROI. | Share rough time, delay, close-rate, or job-value assumptions if known. |
| AI readiness rubric | Scores for repeatability, data cleanliness, revenue proximity, human review, tool readiness, and risk. | Separates practical AI assistance from unsafe or premature automation. | List tools, fields, templates, and approval rules used today. |
| Ranked payback table | Three to seven improvement opportunities scored by value, effort, confidence, complexity, and risk. | Prioritizes the first safe move instead of producing a broad wish list. | Flag constraints, staff capacity, and any workflows that should remain manual. |
| AI assistance mode map | Recommendations for drafting, research, routing, reporting, follow-up support, or automation only after rules are proven. | Shows what AI should help with and what a human still owns. | Provide examples that can be redacted and reviewed safely. |
| Human oversight map | Review owner, approval checkpoint, escalation rules, failure cases, and customer-facing boundaries. | Protects trust, quality, and accountability before any customer-visible work changes. | Name who approves messages, estimates, refunds, exceptions, or schedule changes. |
| Prompt and SOP starter pack | Draft prompts, review-queue SOP, exception checklist, and operating notes for the selected workflow. | Gives the owner, VA, operations lead, or builder something practical to test. | Share current templates, scripts, status labels, or common replies when available. |
| First pilot ticket | A build-ready ticket with trigger, inputs, output, owner, acceptance criteria, risks, and measurement plan. | Turns the report into a clear next action for a builder or internal operator. | Confirm the first workflow you would be willing to test for 30 days. |
| 30-day operating plan | Weekly review cadence, metrics, quality checks, evidence to collect, and expansion rules. | Keeps the first pilot measured and reversible instead of becoming uncontrolled automation. | Decide who reviews the pilot weekly and what metric would prove it is useful. |
Starting path
The current public site is designed for honest pre-payment scoping. It helps you prepare the minimum useful packet without implying checkout, scheduling, or live intake infrastructure that is not active yet.
Use the AI intake to choose one workflow and generate a short scoping note in your browser. Do not paste passwords, API keys, or private customer lists.
The workflow, rough volume, current tools, approval boundary, and safe examples need to be clear enough for a useful Payback Map before payment.
The 72-hour delivery window starts only after scope, payment, and safe starting materials are confirmed—not after reading this page or clicking the intake.
Included and excluded
The intro offer is the workflow map and pilot starter kit. Implementation, account access, and customer-facing sends are separate decisions after the audit.
72-hour delivery path
The process is designed to stay useful with redacted examples and rough numbers, while keeping risky system access out of the intro audit.
Pick one repeated workflow with visible delay, rework, missed follow-up, owner interruption, or manual coordination.
Use redacted examples, rough volumes, tool notes, templates, and approval rules. Do not share passwords or sensitive customer lists.
Inventory steps, identify bottlenecks, estimate value ranges, and score AI readiness across repeatability, data, risk, and review clarity.
Produce the ranked payback table, assistance mode map, prompt/SOP starter pack, first pilot ticket, and 30-day plan.
Check the report for specific evidence, clear assumptions, safe human oversight, and no unsupported revenue or automation claims.
Use the report to pilot, defer, collect more evidence, keep the workflow manual, or scope implementation separately.
Why $299 can make sense
A useful report identifies at least one credible payback path: saved admin time, recovered follow-up, reduced implementation waste, or safer pilot selection. The numbers are estimates to verify, not guarantees.
If the first workflow can remove a few hours of repeated owner or coordinator work, the report has a clear break-even path.
For higher-ticket service work, a better handoff can justify the audit even before full automation is built.
The map can prevent spending on the wrong app, VA task, or automation before the workflow is understood.
If the Payback Map does not identify at least three practical workflow improvements with a clear first payback path, it will be revised once or refunded.
This guarantee is about report usefulness, not guaranteed ROI, revenue recovery, implementation, or automation results.
Before you start
See the format, scoring, ranked map, prompt/SOP examples, first pilot ticket, and handoff plan.
Use the checklist to gather safe workflow notes, volumes, examples, tools, and approval boundaries.
Compare your process to missed-call recovery, painting CRM, flooring qualification, or landscape scheduling examples.